Friday, May 13, 2022

Opinion: India’s bulldozer raj springs from the very opposite impulse of nation building


Hindutva State

Nations forged in devastation resemble petty mafias of muscle and flex. Neither a new politics, nor a vibrant economy can flourish in this morass.

Nikita Sud

Yesterday · 09:00 am


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A bulldozer demolishes illegal structures at the New Friends Colony in New Delhi on Tuesday. | PTI

The Bharatiya Janata Party regime in states and at the Centre is flexing its muscles again. A presumptive prime minister has returned to power in Uttar Pradesh on the power of the bulldozer, an election motif.

Chief Minister Adityanath’s tactic of razing the illegal properties of those his government sees as criminals, including righteous protestors to discriminatory laws such as the Citizenship Amendment Act, is being replicated enthusiastically in other places.

Another ambitious BJP chief minister ordered the bulldozer treatment for people accused of disturbing the peace during a Hindu religious procession in Khargone, Madhya Pradesh. This was repeated in Raisen and Sheopur in March; the latter as instant justice for alleged rape.

Not to be left behind, the BJP-controlled North Delhi Municipal Corporation, unleashed bulldozers on the largely lower-caste, migrant Bengali Muslim communities of Jahangirpuri in April. 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The reasoning was familiar: Muslims were accused of clashing with Hindus during a religious procession, and needed to be taught a quick and decisive lesson. The playbook was repeated in Khambhat, Gujarat, around the same time.

It was also unsuccessfully attempted in Delhi’s Shaheen Bagh, the epicentre of the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act that were led by women in late 2019 and early 2020.

Emboldened by the ricocheting Bulldozer Raj, BJP leaders are on record, urging state authorities to identify and demolish the illegal properties of “rioters” and “Bangladeshis and Rohingyas”. The latter is a dog whistle for Muslims, who the BJP cadre is eager to classify as outsiders in their purported Hindu rashtra.

The modern state’s ‘vision’

India’s current rulers are hardly the first to uproot the Old and/or deviant order to bring in the New. Power, and the vision that drives it, has always been invested in space. Recall, for instance, the modernising states of the mid-20th century, which cleared grasslands and forests, dammed rivers, and flattened urban “squatter” settlements, all in the name of modernisation.

Colonial Britain, for instance, stripped 12,000 square km of bush in Tanganyika, East Africa, in the late 1940s to introduce “scientific” agriculture and alleviate post-war food shortages. Countries ranging from the United States to Ghana, Egypt, China and India intervened in the course of rivers to produce hydel energy, and irrigate fields that were feeding growing populations, and were increasingly dependent on water-thirsty, artificial inputs.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The planned, glass and chrome cities of today, be it Singapore, Mumbai, London or New York emerged from struggles over space between modernising, entrepreneurial states that sought to attract capital, and the working poor who have been systematically pushed to the margins in cycles of gentrification.

We may agree or disagree with the 20th century state’s modernising vision. However, it had a vision. It sought to build a new order of mass industrial production, self-sufficiency and export capacity in agriculture, and urban centres that would power its ambitions of growth and development.

Despite its many flaws, the post-independence Indian state fits this developmental mould, as evidenced in its economic achievements. India’s gross domestic product went from $37.03 billion in 1960 to $321 billion by 1990. This rose further with the embrace of market liberalisation, crossing the $2 trillion-mark in 2014.

Economic pipe dreams

With the ambition and bluster that has characterised his reign, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared that India would become a $5 trillion-economy by 2024, i.e. in time for his third run for prime ministership.

However, even before the Covid-19 pandemic hit, every indicator suggested that this assertion was a pipe dream. In 2019, the economy was valued at $2.7 trillion, with experts pronouncing the $5 trillion aspiration to be “simply out of the question”. GDP, which hit a high note of 8.5% in 2010, has been in free fall since 2016. It plunged to -7.3% in 2020.

The government and its cheerleaders are adept at shifting the goalposts. An industrialist whose personal graph has risen and risen, despite the general economic meltdown, recently proclaimed that India would be a $30 trillion economy by 2050. However, other than the consistent enrichment of the few, there is no sign of a larger, developmental model for the many.

There are many welfare schemes of course: occasional free power to distressed farmers, subsidised gas connections to women living below the poverty line, and others. However, building up from here, the worldview driving, say, agriculture or energy policy, remains unclear.

While there is palpable confusion and a lack of direction in the economic sphere, there is more clarity in politics. India is being moulded into a Hindu majoritarian state, built on the submission of religious and other minorities, dissenters and critics.

Bulldozers, laws such as the Citizenship Amendment Act, attacks on Muslim dress, food and modes of worship, and the subversion of institutions such as the courts and media that could question this lurching to Hindu rashtra, are all part of the design.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The bulldozer is an apt, but also problematic symbol of this New India. Forget about the minorities and dissenters here, as the nationalists want us to do.

Even for the 85% that this model claims to represent, the bulldozer largely symbolises hate and destruction. It can uproot, and terrorise. But where is the vision of what comes after? Along with the vision, where are the plans, policies, and people that will bring it to fruition?

Without a constructive, developmental, progressive worldview, spaces and nations forged in devastation begin to resemble petty mafias of muscle and flex.

These mafias are controlled by local bosses drunk on their power, building personal wealth, self-aggrandising, bolstered by sycophants and yes-men, and bent on destruction to show who is king. Neither a new politics, nor a vibrant economy can flourish in this morass.

Today’s bulldozer raj is mafia raj. It is as far as we can possibly be from nation building.

Nikita Sud is a Professor of the Politics of Development at Oxford University.

Source: scrollin

The untold story of India’s Rs 3,000-crore farmer scheme scam

Assam saw the highest amount being siphoned off under Modi government’s PM-Kisan scheme. Our investigation from the state reveals how the scam worked.

Sadiq Naqvi & Snigdha Poonam
May 11, 2022 · 06:30 am


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Design | Rubin D'Souza

On October 29, Himadri Seshadri, assisting officer at Assam’s Agriculture Directorate, reached her office and opened up the website of PM-Kisan, the central government’s flagship welfare scheme for farmers. Launched in 2019, PM-Kisan aims to pay Rs 6,000 in three instalments every year to millions of eligible farmers across India.

Seshadri typed in the organisation’s official username and password to access the dashboard for the state of Assam. She found herself locked out.

“Someone had changed the password. They must have done it at night because the last time I logged in was before leaving the office,” Seshadri told us when we met her at her Guwahati office the next day.

Only those with official usernames and passwords can log in to the portal. By entering these in, they generate one-time passwords that are sent to mobile numbers linked to those usernames, and are valid for 24 hours. (This January, the OTP window was changed to a few minutes.) The usernames, also referred to as IDs, are assigned to agriculture departments across districts, and allows them to add beneficiaries to the scheme, and monitor their numbers.

Seshadri dialed the tech support at the National Informatics Centre, or NIC, in Delhi, which provides technology-related support to central and state governments. She was told that they had received similar complaints from other states as well. She reset the password using an OTP that came to the mobile phone of the state nodal officer.

When she logged in using the new password, Seshadri realised something strange. A report she had pulled out of the portal for Assam the previous evening had showed only 34 official usernames as active: one in each of Assam’s 33 districts and one at the directorate. Now, the number of active usernames for Assam was 36.

When she called the NIC again, a technician told her that the two new usernames were created at the state-level for Assam, which could only have been done at the NIC’s head office in Delhi.

But the mobile numbers corresponding to the new state-level usernames belonged to Rajasthan. The engineer said it was a case of hacking.

Meanwhile, IP addresses linked to the usernames led officials to a traffic roundabout in Lucknow. “It is a case of an organised cyber heist,” Debjit Neog, Assam’s Nodal Officer for PM-Kisan, told us.

The agriculture director made a complaint to Assam Police’s Criminal Investigation Department, or CID. The directorate also asked the NIC to block the two usernames and to find out if any new beneficiaries had been added to the portal. None were, they learnt later on.

This wasn’t an isolated incident. By this time, a barrage of irregularities had already come to light in PM-Kisan, involving scores of unauthorised usernames and thousands of unintended beneficiaries. In May 2020, the state government had ordered a probe into the matter, which was carried out by then additional chief secretary Jishnu Barua. Among the report’s many damning findings that have not been reported so far was that, of the 31 lakh individuals who had received the cash transfer, 15 lakh were not eligible for it.

The sums of money involved are staggering. Between February 2019 and July 14, 2021, 11.08 crore beneficiaries across the country received more than Rs 1.37 lakh crore, the Union agriculture minister told Parliament in July. But he admitted that 42 lakh beneficiaries who together received Rs 3,000 crore in that time had actually been ineligible.

Our interviews with dozens of government officials and others involved with the PM-Kisan scheme in Assam revealed that in the state, these beneficiaries included non-farmers, single farmers receiving funds in multiple accounts, government servants, minors, deceased persons and people who can’t be found anywhere.

So far, these anomalies have been reported as isolated, though widespread, incidents. But Scroll.in’s investigation suggests that they occurred in a systematic way.

Since July, the Centre has been urging the states to bring back the Rs 3,000 crore from the fake beneficiaries even as millions of deserving farmers remain excluded from the scheme. According to the Union agriculture minister’s statement in Parliament, Assam must recover the highest amount, of Rs 500 crore paid to 8.3 lakh ineligible beneficiaries. It is followed by Punjab (Rs 357.9 crore), Maharashtra (Rs 340.6 crore) and Tamil Nadu (Rs 258.6 crore).

Tracking the scam in Assam reveals that it began with a rush to add beneficiaries at a breakneck speed ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha election. But once initiated, our investigation shows, the scam spiralled out of control as key government officials colluded with local middlemen to extend the cash benefit to anyone who could pay for it.

Read full article: scrollin

Plotting a Hindu Rashtra: Inside the hate-filled world of India’s Trads

Even the BJP and the RSS are held in contempt for not pursuing the goal of Hindu supremacy seriously enough.

Aishwarya Iyer
Yesterday · 06:30 am


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Popular in online 'trad' groups are images of Parshuram, an angry Brahmin defender of the faith in Hindu mythology.

The road to the Hindu Rashtra runs through the history of Vatican city, a participant proposed in a live audio discussion on Twitter Spaces on January 11.

The topic of the discussion was: “HinduRashtra w/o Trads - Possible? How would it look?”

Hindu Rashtra is an alternative polity that Hindu supremacists aspire to. According to them, it will be created by dismantling India’s secular Constitution and commandeering existing institutions to give primacy to Hindus.

Trads, as a handle called ParthaSarthi, who was hosting the Twitter Spaces discussion put it, “are basically traditionalists who are conservative Hindus who believe in the original Hinduism mentioned in the shastras”, or religious scriptures.

This shadowy section of the Hindu Right burst into the national spotlight in January, when the police in Delhi and Mumbai arrested six people for allegedly organising mock online auctions of Muslim women on an app called “Bulli Bai”. Online networks of Trads were said to have orchestrated it. They were also believed to be behind a similar “auction” held last year on another app called “Sulli Deals”.

Days after the first arrest, the audio discussion on Twitter offered a glimpse of the Trad worldview.

“The pope is ruling us, because our Constitution is not our own, it is given to us by Christians,” said ParthaSarthi. According to her, it was meant to serve the “goals and propaganda” of foreign institutions.

A Twitter user going by the name of Agni offered an alternative. “The basis of Hindu Rashtra will be smritis and shrutis [traditional Hindu tenets],” he said. “If that is not the basis, it will be a Western concept.”

Ironically for a group that aspires to weed out western concepts from India, some drew inspiration from western models. A user called NikBruh cited the creation of Vatican City in 1929 under Italy’s fascist dictator, Benito Mussolini, as a possible prototype for the Hindu Rashtra. The treaty recognised the Vatican City as an independent state under the jurisdiction of the pope.

“The Vatican city was created in 1929 under the Lateran treaty – similarly, I am not asking for an independent area but within the realm of cooperative federalism we can have a small area where I will be given the freedom to profess my religion,” NikBruh said. “This could be Ayodhya, Kashi or Haridwar.”

He argued that conditions were ripe in India for a new political order. “It is only possible when there are tensions in society,” he said.

Over the last three months, Scroll.in has been tracking these conversations on Twitter, Clubhouse, Reddit and Instagram to piece together a picture of India’s Trads. It isn’t just fascist Italy from which they seek inspiration. They also draw upon the world of the American Alt-Right to give expression to their violent fantasies of subjugating Muslims, Dalits, women and sexual minorities.

Impatient for a Hindu Rashtra, they abhor India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and its ideological parent, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, for not pursuing the goal seriously enough.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Read full article: scrollin