Saturday, September 12, 2026

Why do anti-reservation ideologues love the creamy layer so much?

  • 11 Sep, 2026
  • Share

Welcome to The India Fix by Shoaib Daniyal. A newsletter on Indian politics.


Caste-based reservations are a major component of what ​​political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot calls “India’s silent revolution”: the fact that Indian democracy has made space for lower castes after millennia of oppression.

Given the scale of change they promise, it is hardly surprising that quotas for members of the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes have always been bitterly contested. The latest iteration of this dispute is a group called the Reservation Hatao Andolan or Movement to Remove Reservations. In August, its followers held protestsin Delhi’s Jantar Mantar protest site.

Some critics claim that the group was a tactical way to undercut the youth solidarity that had led to the removal of a Union minister only weeks before. Indeed, while the earlier so-called cockroach protests identified the government as being responsible for the lack of employment, the Reservation Hatao Andolan tried to shift the focus to quotas. The protesters claimed that upper castes were not getting jobs since the pie for them had shrunk.

Cat got the cream

As an upper-caste interest group, the Reservation Hatao Andolan’s demands were designed to increase employment opportunities for the general category, as India’s unreserved seats are called. They want quotas kept away from private-sector jobs as well as reservations to be based on economic rather than caste criteria.

The pressure group also called for the exclusion of the “creamy layer” when it came to Dalit and Adivasi quotas. The creamy layer – an incredible Indianism – refers to the elite within a caste bloc. The Reservation Hatao Andolan also wants to debar families from being able to apply for reserved positions if a member has availed of quotas previously.

This emphasis on the the creamy layer is odd since the policy has no effect on upper caste quotas at all. It does not expand the general category: the number of seats available to them remains exactly the same. The Reservation Hatao Andolan is an unabashed upper-caste pressure group, so why does it care how caste quotas are organised internally?

The logic of reservations

To understand why the Reservation Hatao Andolan is so worked up about the creamy layer, we would first have to understand why India has caste-based reservations in the first place.

Contrary to perception, India’s caste-based quotas are not a poverty alleviation programme. India has many of those, given that they are critical to a poor country. Caste-based quotas, however, only apply to a small pool of government jobs in India. Most Indians never interact with caste-based quotas – an absurd design were it to be some sort of welfare scheme.

Most people batting for creamy-layer exclusion will point to the fact that many people are excluded from availing of quotas – and claim that this policy would widen the net. But of course, barring the creamy layer does not really solve that, since the number of jobs under quotas are so small, they will always exclude the vast majority of Indians.

If not poverty-eradication then what is the point of reservations? The aim is simple: to broaden the representation of Indians from marginal groups in critical areas such as higher education and the bureaucracy. Given that upper castes have maintained a near-total domination of these spaces, quotas allow representatives from other castes to gain a toehold.

The logic is that these representatives will frame policy and shape society in a way that benefits far more Indians than the earlier upper-caste-dominated system.

In effect, the very aim of reservations is to build new elites – just that these elites would now come from hitherto marginalised groups.

Who gets upward mobility?

It is this logic that that creamy layer exclusion seeks to undercut. Building a socially and economically elite class takes generations. Talk to rich upper castes around you and you will find signs of privilege going back generations. Someone’s great-great grandfather was a collector under the Raj. A great grandmother who was a graduate at a time when it was rare for an Indian woman to go to school at all. Tales of zamindars and boxwallahs abound among upper castes who occupy elite positions in Indian society today.

This is borne out by research. In 2022, economists Sam Asher, Paul Novosad and Charlie Rafkin published a paper that used the 2012 India Human Development Survey and the 2012 Socioeconomic and Caste Census to show that upward mobility in India is poor by global standards. Their research makes it clear that kvetching about upper castes being left behind has little empirical data behind it.

“Higher caste groups have experienced constant and high upward mobility over time, a result that contradicts a popular notion that it is increasingly difficult for higher-caste Hindus to get ahead,” the paper states quite bluntly.

Creamy layer exclusion would stop this process of elite formation for backward castes, Dalits and Adivasis. The upper castes had the freedom to build on generations of eliteness to create the present social and economic capital they enjoy. But the creamy layer exclusion would pull the ladder up for other castes trying to do the same.

Undercutting the project

And remember, quotas are all about building representation. Without elites to represent diverse caste interests in key positions in the state, this project would have failed.

It was the Supreme Court that introduced in the concept of the “creamy layer” in a judgement in 1992 that related to Other Backward Class quotas. This served to significantly dilute the impact of OBC reservations. Currently, the court is also hearing a plea to apply the filter to Dalit and Adivasi quotas.

The fact that the Reservation Hatao Andolan is adopting this as a demand, even though it does not affect general category numbers, is thus not a paradox at all. It understands well how powerful a weapon creamy layer exclusion could be to weaken the small but vocal non-upper caste elites that reservations have created thus far.


We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.

 Source: https://tinyurl.com/mr2fphnb

Monday, August 10, 2026

Modi is one of India’s most powerful prime ministers – so why is he so bothered by Gen Z profanity?

 5 Aug, 2026

  

A screengrab of the video posted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on July 23. | Narendra Modi, @narendramodi/Instagram

Welcome to The India Fix by Shoaib Daniyal. A newsletter on Indian politics.

As always, if you’ve been sent this newsletter and like it, to get it in your inbox every week, sign up here (click on “follow”).


India’s prime minister Narendra Modi has, in his 12 years in office, cultivated an image of being larger than life. He rarely addresses the country outside of election rallies.

So late on Friday, when he took to Instagram to release a video in vertical format, it was already an event. Even more remarkable was the fact that Modi was on the back foot. He seemed to adopt a conciliatory approach towards protesters in Delhi’s Jantar Mantar angry with his government for corruption in the education sector.

Specifically, Modi addressed the viral clips of young women protestors using profanity to poke fun at him. “I forgive misguided children who abused me,” he said. “Let’s show them the right path.”

For a muscular, right wing movement like Hindutva, this was an unusual position to take. Indeed, Modi’s video was released after his supporters had been hunting down young women and girls for making fun of the prime minister using purportedly obscene language.

“There is no limit to the death threats and rape threats that I’ve been receiving,” a distraught 23-year-old Shraddha Singh told my colleague Ayush Tiwari.

So terrifying was this online mob that a 15-year-old was forced to release a video apologising to Modi. “This is my first and last mistake,” she said in the video, clearly terrorised by what was happening. “I will never do anything like this.”

Her widowed mother had had to flee her Noida home, reported the Indian Express, given that police and Hindutva groups were turning up at their doorstep.

Failed playbook

All of this comes in the wake of the Jantar Mantar protests when young protestors forced the Modi government to fire its education minister. It was a spectacular embarrassment for the Bharatiya Janata Party, given that the Hindutva party has practised a brawny politics of never bending to public pressure. Unlike in previous regimes, when ministers would resign in case of significant failures, the last 12 years have not seen a single instance of this. (MJ Akbar, the only Modi minister who’s resigned, left because of a personal criminal allegation.)

The BJP’s playbook was to simply brazen it out – helped by a largely pliant media that rarely asks hard questions. Demonstrations against the BJP have been met with violence and, in one egregious case, the Adityanath government in Uttar Pradesh tried to head off protests by forcibly cremating the body of a teenager who had allegedly been raped and murdered.

The BJP today runs what is possibly India’s strongest Union government. It controls all key state institutions and, using them, ensures that Opposition parties are cut down by effecting defections. Since it also controls much of the media, that means it enjoys almost unchecked power.

So why is it so bothered by some young woman’s ribaldry on a street in Delhi?

Extremism kryptonite: ridicule

In 1946, an American activist called Stetson Kennedy did something incredibly brave by infiltrating the United States’ violent White nationalist group, Ku Klux Klan. However, since so much of the state apparatus was controlled either by Klan members or people sympathetic to it, Kennedy was forced to turn to the entertainment sector. He collaborated with a popular children’s radio show called the Adventures of Superman to create a villain based on the Ku Klux Klan.

This, almost overnight, changed the image of the White nationalist group. From being held in awe, they became an object of ridicule. “Kennedy’s mission was to deflate that [Klan’s psychological] power by reporting on the Klan with ridicule, holding up their ritual as childish, and revealing the priesthood’s secrets to break their spirits,” his biographer wrote. The effect on the Klan was immediate. Attendance dropped at meetings. It turned out that poking fun at this extremist group was more effective than the legal action that had been taken until then.

An even more pertinent example of this is from the 2013 Gezi Park protest in Turkey. Like India, Turkey is ruled by a right-wing populist strongman, Tayyip Erdogan. To puncture his image, protestors not only used humour but also, like in Jantar Mantar, married it with profanity aimed at the prime minister. “We are continuously smooching Tayyip,” one graffiti read.

The protestors constantly poked fun at Erdoğan’s hypermasculine image using “swearwords that question his penis size, heterosexuality, and impenetrability”, one article noted. Like with Modi, the swearing was what most affected Erdogan and the ribald graffiti was most actively targeted for removal by his government.

Arguably, Indian protesters were quite mild compared to their Turkish counterparts. Swear words against Modi were only a very small part of the protest. But given how vulnerable right-wing, masculine politics is to mockery, it is no wonder that the profanity seems to have made the most impact. Also not surprising is the fact that ditties infantilising Modi have also gone viral, especially one that calls him a “56-inch monkey”, poking fun at the possibly exaggerated masculine claim that he has a 56-inch-wide chest.

They started it

Though Hindutva supporters are angry that their leader was abused during the protests, ironically they must bear quite a lot of the blame for it.

For one, the open use of expletives in Indian politics is very much a post-2014 phenomenon. Much of this includes abuse by BJP supporters and functionaries. Many of these abusive people are powerful and openly supported by the BJP’s top brass. On social media, many abusive handles are even followed by the prime minister himself.

In 2023, a BJP MP, Ramesh Bidhuri openly abused a Muslim Opposition MP in Parliament with shockingly communal slurs. He faced no serious action and is now a BJP MLA. Things have come full circle, in fact, and Bidhuri used communal slurs against the Jantar Mantar protestors too.

If the BJP now, of all parties, complains of bad language, that would hold little water given its own history.

 

 

https://xhttps://x.com/nehadixit123/status/2083503250368844039?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2083503250368844039%7Ctwgr%5Eba29ea076bb40fa78d090403c9c3dce63e40b52b%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Findiafix.stck.me%2Fpost%2F2091105%2FModi-is-one-of-Indias-most-powerful-prime-ministers-so-why-is-he-so-bothered-by-Gen-Z-profanity.com/nehadixit123/status/2083503250368844039?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2083503250368844039%7Ctwgr%5Eba29ea076bb40fa78d090403c9c3dce63e40b52b%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Findiafix.stck.me%2Fpost%2F2091105%2FModi-is-one-of-Indias-most-powerful-prime-ministers-so-why-is-he-so-bothered-by-Gen-Z-profanity

 Too much of a godi thing

Moreover, Modi’s extreme veneration by godi media or pro-government media, eventually made him a ripe target for ridicule. Given that Gen Z has come of age in the Modi era, all they have seen is the prime minister being near-worshipped on television. There were no standard pressure valves for anger against the government to be expressed.

When Indians eventually found a way to express anti-government narratives during the protests, the anger exploded after being pent up for so long – and some of this took the form of ribald ridicule of Prime Minister Modi.

With the godi media failing to protect Modi’s image, online mobs and the police took over, physically threatening and doxxing young women for ridiculing the prime minister. Unfortunately for the BJP, physical force is a poor instrument for narrative control, which meant Modi himself had to crack open his Instragram to “forgive” those who made fun of him.

The BJP owes a significant part of its power to the persona of Modi himself. However, as has been clear for a couple of years at least, Modi’s star is not on the ascendant anymore. The BJP was unable to win a simple majority in the last general election and its power now depends more on the control of state institutions rather than actual popularity.

And things have now reached a pass where Indians are taking to ribaldry to try and undercut Modi. This should worry the BJP and its supporters.


We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.

Source: https://tinyurl.com/2z8kycj7